Skip to main content

Fundamental Kinematic Equations For Industrial Robots

In robotics, a kinematic model is the mathematical relationship that maps a robot’s joint variables (angles or displacements) to the pose (position + orientation) of its body or end-effector — and vice-versa — without using forces, torques, masses, or inertia.

 

It belongs to Robot Kinematics rather than Robot Dynamics

What the model actually does

It answers two fundamental problems:

1) Forward kinematics (FK)

joint values qpose (x,y,z,R)

Given motor encoder readings → where is the tool tip?


2) Inverse kinematics (IK)

desired pose    joint values\text{desired pose} \;\rightarrow\; \text{joint values}

Given a target position → what should each motor angle be?


Example — mobile robot (differential drive)

State:

(x,y,θ)(x, y, \theta)

Wheel speeds: vL,vRv_L, v_R

v=r2(vR+vL)v = \frac{r}{2}(v_R + v_L) ω=rL(vRvL)\omega = \frac{r}{L}(v_R - v_L) x˙=vcosθ,y˙=vsinθ,θ˙=ω\dot{x} = v\cos\theta,\quad \dot{y} = v\sin\theta,\quad \dot{\theta} = \omega

This lets the robot:

  • estimate its trajectory (odometry)

  • do localization

  • plan paths

No motor torque model required.


Example — robot arm

A 6-axis industrial manipulator:

Joint vector:

q=[θ1,θ2,,θ6]q = [\theta_1,\theta_2,\dots,\theta_6]

Pose:

T06=[Rp01]T_{0}^{6} = \begin{bmatrix} R & p \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatri

Computed using Denavit–Hartenberg parameters.

This is the core of:

  • pick-and-place

  • CNC robots

  • surgical robots

  • manipulators


What is NOT included

A kinematic model ignores:

  • torque

  • inertia

  • friction

  • motor current

  • gravity compensation

Those belong to dynamics.


Why robotics always starts with kinematics

Because most robot software needs only geometry:

TaskNeeds kinematics?Needs dynamics?
Localization
Path planning
SLAM
Visual servoing
Motion control (low speed)
Torque control


A robotic kinematic model is the geometric mapping between actuator motions and the robot’s pose in space, used to predict and control motion without modeling physical forces.

  

The Denavit–Hartenberg (DH) convention is a standardized method used in Robot Kinematics to systematically assign coordinate frames to the links of a serial robot and express the robot’s forward kinematics using a small set of parameters.

It converts a complex 3D mechanism into a sequence of simple homogeneous transformations.


Purpose

Instead of writing geometry manually for each robot, the DH convention provides a repeatable procedure:

Robot geometry    table of parameters    transformation matrices\text{Robot geometry} \;\longrightarrow\; \text{table of parameters} \;\longrightarrow\; \text{transformation matrices}

From that table you can compute:

T0n=A1A2A3AnT_0^n = A_1 A_2 A_3 \cdots A_n

which gives the pose of the end-effector.


The four DH parameters

For each joint ii, only four numbers describe the relative pose between two consecutive links.

ParameterSymbolMeaningType
Link lengthaia_idistance between joint axes along xix_igeometry
Link twistαi\alpha_iangle between joint axes around xix_igeometry
Link offsetdid_idistance along zi1z_{i-1}prismatic variable
Joint angleθi\theta_irotation around zi1z_{i-1}revolute variable

Transformation matrix

Each joint produces one homogeneous transformation:

Ai=[cosθisinθicosαisinθisinαiaicosθisinθicosθicosαicosθisinαiaisinθi0sinαicosαidi0001]A_i = \begin{bmatrix} \cos\theta_i & -\sin\theta_i\cos\alpha_i & \sin\theta_i\sin\alpha_i & a_i\cos\theta_i \\ \sin\theta_i & \cos\theta_i\cos\alpha_i & -\cos\theta_i\sin\alpha_i & a_i\sin\theta_i \\ 0 & \sin\alpha_i & \cos\alpha_i & d_i \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

The end-effector pose:

T0n=i=1nAiT_0^n = \prod_{i=1}^{n} A_i


Key idea

The convention forces every joint motion to occur along a z-axis and every link length along an x-axis.
This drastically simplifies robotic modeling.


Why it is important

The DH convention allows:

  • automatic forward kinematics

  • inverse kinematics derivation

  • Jacobian computation

  • simulation and control implementation

  • universal description of any serial manipulator

It is the most widely used geometric modeling method in industrial robotics.



The Denavit–Hartenberg convention is a standardized four-parameter representation that describes the relative pose between consecutive robot links and enables systematic computation of a manipulator’s kinematics.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to program 8051 based MCU using Ptroteous Schematic capture and Source code editor to use timers using AT892051 + project files

 This tutorial is dedicated to use a 8051 based Microcontroller core and program it using keil's C51 tools on the Proteus Source code editor.  1- Brief History of 8051 one of the first microprocessors 4004 was invented by Intel Corporation as well as  8085 and 8086 microprocessors back in 1981,shortly after Intel introduced an 8-bit microcontroller called the 8051 . It was referred to as system on a chip because it had 128 bytes of RAM, 4K byte of on-chip ROM, two timers, one serial port, and 4 ports (8-bit wide), all on a single chip. When it became so widespread, Intel allowed other manufacturers to make and market different flavors of 8051 with its code compatible with 8051. It means that if you write your program for one flavor of 8051, it will run on other flavors too, regardless of the manufacturer. This has led to several versions with different speeds and amounts of on-chip RAM. 2- Features of AT892051 Microcontroller Compatible with MCS®-51Products 2K ...

What is the ESP32 VSPI / HSPI

 The ESP32 integrates four SPI peripherals. SPI0 and SPI1 are used to access the ESP32’s attached flash memory and thus are currently not open to users to be used . They share one signal bus via an arbiter. SPI2 and SPI3 are general purpose SPI controllers, sometimes referred to as HSPI and VSPI, respectively. They are open for use. SPI2 and SPI3 have independent signal buses with the same respective names. Each bus has three CS lines to drive up to three SPI slaves.  

Industrial Internet Use-Cases

The potential for the Industrial Internet is vast with opportunities spread over wide areas of productivity, such as logistics, aviation, transportation, healthcare, energy production, oil and gas production, and manufacturing. As a result, many use-cases will make industry executives wake up and consider the possibilities of the IIoT. After all, industry only requires a minimal shift in productivity to deliver huge revenue, an example is that even an increase of 1% of productivity can produce huge revenue benefits such as aviation fuel savings. In order to realize these potential profits, industry has to adopt and adjust to the Industrial Internet of Things. However, spotting, identifying, and then strategically targeting the opportunities of the IIoT is not quite as easy as it might seem. It is important, therefore, to create use-cases that are appropriate to vertical businesses. For instance, the requirements of manufacturing differ from logistics, which also differs to healthcare....